Benedict Is Still The Pope

CA 1 Benedict Is Still The Pope 5,162 views •Nov 26, 2019 139 7 Share Save Brian Murphy 341 subscribers This is a presentation based on Canon Law as to why the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI was invalid. 41 Comments augustin tio Add a public comment... John P John P 1 year ago (edited) Thank you Brian for having the courage to publish this truth. Just your simple, clear, layman's voice is so perfect. Pope Benedict also resigned under duress, I know this because in his anniversary of his ordination in 2016 we can clearly observe bishop Georg Ganswein giving the frail, delirious looking pope a masonic hand sign insistently until the frail pope makes the sign himself. This is elder abuse and the holy father was not making this sign by his own free will. Watch the video here on youtube. Canon 188. Pray for Pope Benedict the one and only current vicar of Christ. 9 Brian Murphy Brian Murphy 11 months ago Diego, you can see the Italian video at www.ppbxvi.org. Look on the bottom right for the link. Cosmic Fugue Cosmic Fugue 1 year ago (edited) Heard you from start to finish including the most important part... the prayer. I think you've hit 'bulls eye'. You seem to have revealed to us the third secret of Fatima that unfortunately previous Popes seemed to suppress. Another man who is saying this is Don Alessandro Maria Minutella. He's been teaching us true Catholics including the ones still yet with their eyes closed that Benedict XVI is still The Pope and that Cardinal Bergoglio is not the Pope. Thank you for your work and research and sharing your true words with regards to how the Papacy works or should work. You were extremely clear in your talk I understood you perfectly. Jesus, Joseph and Mary pray for us. Praise be Jesus Christ amen. 8 Patrick Negro Patrick Negro 1 year ago But Pope Francis’ election was valid.And in Church history popes have resigned. 2 William Passfield William Passfield 1 year ago Could the two lightning strikes at St Peter's Basilica in Rome on the day Pope Benedict announced his resignation signify there was going to be two popes in the Vatican? The lightning signifying the presence of Satan in the Vatican... Alfredo Cassano Alfredo Cassano 9 months ago Am I wrong or, from what I understand at 2:20, you are in favour of death penalty, mr. Murphy? Gilbert Mariano Gilbert Mariano 11 months ago Thank you for upholding the truth about Pope Benedict XVI's papacy. 2 Patrick Negro Patrick Negro 1 year ago Have you sir studied Canon law?Only priests studying Canon law have to learn Latin.It is not required anymore. rush mermaids rush mermaids 6 months ago My poor Holy Vicar, Pope Benedict XVI will be ousted from the Holy See of Rome February 11, 2012 My dearly beloved daughter, the wars are escalating everywhere and very soon, the Hand of My Father will intervene, to bring this evil to a halt. Fear not, for the plans to save humanity are completed and it will not be long now for My Great Mercy, which will be given to each of you. Never fear the works of the antichrist, when you, dear children, have the power within you, to weaken his grasp on the world, through your prayers. Other world leaders will be killed soon and My poor Holy Vicar, Pope Benedict XVI, will be ousted from the Holy See in Rome. Last year, my daughter, I told you of the plot within the corridors of the Vatican. A plan to destroy My Holy Vicar was devised in secret, on the l7th of March 2011, and this will come to fruition, for it has been foretold. Spread My Holy Word to every corner of the world now and arrange for the printed versions of My Messages to be spread to as many countries as possible. You are being guided, so you must do what is best. Ask Me, in prayer, to send you help and it will be done. Your Jesus NOTE one year later on the 11 February 2013 Pope Benedict XVI announced his plan to resign 1 Susan D Susan D 5 months ago From the beginning, Jesus did not write canon law, but called bishops to evangelize and baptize all people. Bishops are human, and we have not always had holy bishops of Rome. Pope Urban VI was elected pope in early 1378, but by the end of the year, a great many of those who had elected him went off to elect another, an anti-pope. There was great confusion as to who was rally pope. Canon law was preventing the calling of a council to end the confusion, so canon law was circumvented, the legitimate pope resigned (the last pope to resign before Pope Benedict XVI) to end the Western Schism of 1378. No such confusion exists or existed with the conclave that elected Pope Francis. The electing cardinal bishops did not collectively march off to elect anyone other than Pope Francis. Mr. Murphy says a few newspapers reported (or editorialized?) they had discovered an anomaly in the form of resignation Pope Benedict wrote. Mr. Murphy also tosses in unproven accusations of many kinds, none of which have any bearing on his point that the written resignation of Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI was flawed. Nevertheless, it was accepted and acted upon by the cardinal bishops. I appreciate the care that Brian Murphy has spent on trying to bolster his position against Pope Francis. But he is correct that there is only one pope at a time. Anyone being loyal to Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI should be obedient, as he is, to Pope Francis. Camillo Benso Camillo Benso 1 year ago @Brian Murphy Dear Mr Murphy you are wrong about the papal ring. Sadly pope Benedict XVI doesn't wear the papal ring after his invalid resignation. Pope Benedict XVI now wears different rings. More, I cannot check the literal authenticity of that alleged ancient prophecy by sr. Mariana. But all the rest is true facts and very reasonable opinions. Thank you very much for your clear presentation. Why did pope Benedict XVI choose to be an absentee pope? Mystery! But it is now evident that Francis is just the latest antipope. Anne Marie L Anne Marie L 1 year ago Thank you Mr Murphy for the clarification of the truth surrounding the papacy! This should help convince those who have been standing at the crossroads wondering who to follow! Our spiritual instinct that something was not right has now been confirmed. We need to support our true pope Benedict with our prayers while waiting for heaven to intervene! 5 Pax Christi Pax Christi 1 year ago Very very very Interesting 🧐 Tut Ankh Amon Tut Ankh Amon 1 year ago Amen! Amen! Amen! 3 Gregory Libera Gregory Libera 10 months ago Wht did McCarrick lobby Francis, wht was he lobbied? Jean Jean 9 months ago Why discuss the laws of men and wait til the end of the video to start telling it like it is ? Much simpler than that is the fact that just like any of us, any vow made to God, or Jesus if you will, is unbreakable. For this very same reason, a spouse cannot divorce and remarry, if married before Jesus. If not, well they just aren't married at all. So the same goes for a priest, or a pope for that matter. Anyone who breaks a vow made to the Lord, will answer to him of that broken vow, being a grave sin. No need to study canon law for this, it is written in the bible. You may say, the pope is above canon law and you will be right, but no man is above God's laws. And to the man who was to be the first pope ever, Jesus said to Peter when his thoughts were not aligned with the ones of God: get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men. Now, the whole truth has not been told to us, there are ongoing wars and vendettas in the Vatican, from the so called religious mafia. The false prophet had to take office, just like Judas had to do his thing, for all of the scriptures must be fulfilled. More than two hundred years ago, saint Catherine Emmerich had seen this vision, when a man was in the place of the pope but was not the real pope, she could not see where the real one was. Now that we know what and who the beast and the false prophet of Revelation are, let's wait and see who the antichrist is... It shall not be too long. S W S W 10 months ago Sick side burns. It is obvious that "Frank at the bank" is not, nor has he ever been Pope. D JG D JG 5 months ago Actually, Benedict's intent is crucial. For instance, by canon law, if his intent had been to escape danger by resigning, his resignation would have been invalid. But the canonical necessity is not merely that Benedict have an intent to resign, but that he have an intent to resign validly. In this case, this would mean that he must have an intent to resign the office. Such an intent could be discerned by the Church if Benedict effected a clear renunciation and separation of himself from every honor and dignity and power of the papal office, because those honors and dignities and powers are by their very nature inseparable from the office itself. No one can take away from a pope any of the papal office's honors and dignities and powers. So if a pope retains even one of these, he also retains the office, because every honor and dignity and power of the papal office is inseparable from the office itself. The powers and honors of the papal office are both unique and not divisible among two or more persons. This is so because of the divine origin (from Christ) of the papal office, and because the singular nature of the papal office precludes any such division. The Church has always understood this. Consequently, if a pope resigns the papacy with the intention or expectation of retaining (or subsequently sharing) even one of the powers or honors of the office of the papacy, his resignation would be invalid, due to invalid intention (which can also be termed substantial error). Can anyone doubt, given his well-known subsequent actions, that Pope Benedict intended to retain some honor(s) and perhaps power(s) of the office of the papacy? He wears papal white and a papal ring. Also, he still gives the Apostolic Blessing. It was he who answered the Dubia. Inventing a newly coined title (in this case, Pope Emeritus) does not justify retaining an honor or power particular to the papal office. Regardless of ANY pretext for retaining an honor or power of the papal office, doing so invalidates the resignation. Pope Benedict's actions speak louder than his words. Regardless of anything he may have written or said, obviously he sees himself as retaining, and/or sharing with another, some honor(s) and/or power(s) of the papacy. Consequently, his resignation was not valid. robhaidheuch robhaidheuch 1 year ago Joseph Ratzinger is as much an apostate from the Catholic Faith as Jorge Bergoglio. Lanie White Lanie White 1 year ago The blind leading the blind. Wake up people. The counterfeit church born in Vatican II has produced no true pope. Even Paul VI was an apostate. You aren't doing any favors to Catholics faithful to the true faith by your refusal to believe the truth, are responsible for the continuation of the counterfeit church. No true Catholic can claim that a heretic like Ratzinger could be a true pope. He did more to destroy people's faith in his career than the Protestant revolters.